The Pearson correlation coefficient between axillary and oral temperatures was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.28–0.52), between axillary and forehead temperatures was 0.07 (95% CI, −0.07–0.22), and between oral and forehead temperatures was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.11–0.39). The forehead temperature was 0.5 ☌ lower than the average of the axillary and oral temperatures. The average axillary temperature was (36.7 ± 0.41) ☌, the average oral temperature was (36.7 ± 0.33) ☌, and the average forehead temperature was (36.2 ± 0.30) ☌ as a result of the shift in ambient temperature. Results: A total of 1080 tests measuring body temperature were conducted on healthy adults. Analyze the statistical connection, data correlation, and agreement between the forehead temperature and the core body temperature. Utilize the axillary and oral temperatures as the core body temperature standards or the control group to investigate the new approach’s accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting fever/non-fever conditions and the forehead temperature as the experimental group. Methods: Plan an experiment to measure temperature over a thousand times in order to get the corresponding data for human forehead, axillary, and oral temperatures at varying ambient temperatures (14–32 ☌). This research aims to investigate and establish the link between human body surface temperature and core body temperature in a variety of ambient conditions, as well as the associated conversion curves. Consequently, using body surface temperature to characterize the core body temperature of the human body in varied situations is still highly inaccurate. However, the body’s core temperature will remain relatively steady. In page 24 there is a table for measurements for T_c.When the ambient temperature, in which a person is situated, fluctuates, the body’s surface temperature will alter proportionally. Look at Figure 3 in page 23 for heart rate vs. no statistical difference between T_c of genders. This Masters Thesis from University of South Florida indicates findings in regards to clothing and metabolic conditions role on core temperature, i.e. These changes might suggest that men retain more metabolic heat in various locations on the back when exercising in a hot, humid environment compared to women.Īlso This Work shows that, although the temperature distribution pattern among genders are similar, women have lower skin temperature. We found gender differences at four different skin temperature locations. In a study in University of North Texas Source it is concluded that men has different skin temperature, due to different methods of temperature regulation compared to women: *Here is the list of few publications which are using "core temperature" to address the temperature inside the body: based on surface temp.) which is included in the paper (regarding copyright laws, I'm not allowed to put it here. They also proposed two relationships for calculation of T_c based on T_s (Core temp. concluded in " Relationship between core temperature, skin temperature, and heat flux during exercise in heat" that:Īlgorithms for T_c measurement are location-specific and theirĪccuracy is dependent, to a large degree, on sensor placement. However, the measurement of skin temperature is highly dependent on the location of measurement and also ambient temperature, as explained here:Īlso, Xu et. Homogeneous throughout the trunk and head It is also reliable since:Ĭore temperature is easy to measure and temperatures are relatively The measurement of core temperature (it is the right term*) is easy using an invasive method.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |