9/28/2023 0 Comments Feng office copy task templatesFor example, the detection of the target may be easier or harder depending on how similar the perceptual features (e.g., color and shape) are between targets and distractors (e.g., Duncan & Humphreys, 1989). Much is known about attention and object processing by studying visual search. Visual search can be as mundane as looking for a car in a crowded parking lot or as critical as searching a chest image for signs of cancer. Visual search is defined as the process of looking for targets amongst distractors and is a key cognitive ability we use to navigate the visual world. Finally, we present the attentional template theory, a novel mechanistic explanation for SSM errors, which ties together our current understanding of SSM errors and the attentional template literature. Here we review the SSM literature in both radiology and cognitive science and discuss: (1) the current SSM theories (i.e., satisfaction, perceptual set, and resource depletion theories), (2) the eye movement errors that underlie the SSM effect, (3) the existing efforts tested to alleviate SSM errors, and (4) the evolution of methodologies and analyses used when calculating the SSM effect. This phenomenon was renamed the subsequent search miss (SSM) effect in cognitive science. More recently, they have also been found to underlie lab-based search errors in cognitive science experiments (e.g., an observer is more likely to miss a target ‘T’ if a different target ‘T’ was detected). Defined as a decrease in detection rates for a subsequent target when an initial target is found within the image, these multiple target errors are known to underlie errors of omission (e.g., a radiologist is more likely to miss an abnormality if another abnormality is identified). For over 50 years, the satisfaction of search effect has been studied within the field of radiology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |